Display ads in Gmail?

Word on the street is that Google is testing display ads in Gmail.

Pardon me while I attempt to suppress my gag reflex.

Every once in a while I pop into my old Yahoo Mail account to see if some long-lost person with the old address has tried contacting me. Aside from the crappy design/interface, the display ads are what I hate most about it and every other online email service. In fact, Google used to tout the lack of banner ads as a feature. It has recently changed their language from “There are no pop-ups or banner ads in Gmail” to “There are no pop-ups or untargeted banner ads in Gmail”.

Gee, thanks.

I was happy to tolerate text ads next to my email because it’s a free service. I get that’s how things work online. I’m fine with display ads on some sites (depending on the ad, of course) but display ads next to email look horribly tacky.

So here’s a tip for you Chrome users.

Why didn’t Sony do it?

Wednesday I attended the Shift Summit at the Grand America Hotel here in Salt Lake. One of the speakers was Clark Gilbert, president and CEO of the Deseret News Publishing Company and Deseret Digital Media. His specialty is disruptive innovation which he has studied extensively at the Harvard Business School.

He talked about how titans of industry can be overturned, shrunk or entirely passed by because of disruptive innovation. The reason, he said, is because they’re at the top of their game and think of disruptive forces as “Not what we do.”

He asked what industries out there have been stopped dead in their tracks by disruptive influences. The first thing that came to my mind was music, so I offered it as an answer.

Clark then asked a series of questions:

Clark: “Who made the Walkman?”
Me: “Sony.”
Clark: “Who owns three music labels?”
Me: “Sony.”
Clark: “Who owns VH1?”
Me: “Sony.”
Clark: “Why didn’t they create the iPod?”

Bingo.

Goal number one is to identify disruption and get on that bandwagon before it destroys your industry/business/product. A loftier goal is to predict where disruption will happen and be the one to cause it.

The Million Dollar Question

Later someone else asked, “How can one tell if something is going to be disruptive?”

An excellent question.

Clark responded that it’s a lot easier to be a historian/academic than it is a CEO but offered this key insight in the form of a rhetorical question:

“Is it good for the consumer?”

Exactly.

Businesses get very involved in navel-gazing. They focus more on spreadsheets than they do trying to understand their customers. Two examples which are influenced by and the result of disruption: DVDs and DRM.

Digital Rights Management

Companies are so busy trying to protect their content (such as music and software) from piracy that they make it a royal pain in the butt for the people who paid to use it.

Case in point: registering software. You have to fork over your name, address, phone number and email address. Then you have to enter a difficult-to-type 32-character license key (which, if you ever lose, you’re out of luck should you want to reinstall the software) and then hope the verification process works. Adobe recently made their software check the license each time the software was opened, meaning you had to have an Internet connection to use Photoshop. Terrible.

Then you have to sign your life away and accept their “terms of service” which are long and written in legalese. My son probably belongs to Microsoft and I don’t even know it.

Meanwhile, the people who don’t pay for the content and steal it online don’t have to deal with the DRM which was meant to prevent them from getting it in the first place.

Who has the better experience?

DVDs

How about watching a movie at home? You can’t just put in the DVD and hit play. You have to sit through ten minutes of junk the studios want you to watch (multiple trailers, clip montages promoting the studio, seemingly endless “So-and So Studios” and “Produced by One Guy Productions” and “A Subsidiary of that Other Studio” and “A Fill-in-the-Blank Venture”) and, ironically, warnings about piracy, before you get to what you really want to watch: the movie.

Want to put the movie on your laptop to watch on a business trip? Nope. Kids scratch the disc? Out of luck.

Again, the person who downloads the movie off a torrent site for free doesn’t have to deal with any of the restrictions placed on paying customers.

Is there a solution?

I recently heard of an actor who pirates his own movies. Why would anyone do that?

He said he looked for the movie on iTunes, Amazon, Hulu and Netflix. He was willing to pay for it but couldn’t find it anywhere. His only option was to download an illegal copy. So he did.

Dear Studios, this is what is affectionately known as “cutting off your nose to spite your face.”

Here’s a crazy idea: make it easy for people to find your content and pay you for it. Finding anything you want to watch should be a no-brainer. The only trick should be to create a superb buying experience at a fair price.

Groupon now offers personalization. You’re welcome world.

Just one day after I blogged about how annoying and non-applicable Groupon had become I received the above image in an email from them.

Eerie.

Clearly they read The Other Drummer.

The only questions they asked were my gender, zip code and birthdate. Then they immediately kicked me out to the Salt Lake Groupon for today which had something to do with a gym (it involved “Obsidian” and “Mind Body Barre” classes. I don’t know what those are.)

OK Groupon. You’ve bought yourself some more time before I unsubscribe. You also earned some brownie points for reading my blog. Now bring it.

Guess who?

I was just reading about a new app for iOS and Android. Here are some of the features:

  • Location-based reminders
  • Visual search (like Google Goggles?)
  • Search content within other apps (Sweet!)
  • Make dinner reservations

Sounds pretty cool. A combination of Siri and Remember the Milk plus some other stuff. I’d totally try this except…it’s actually the Bing mobile app.

Meh. All of a sudden I’m not interested.

If this were from snappy startup in Silicon Valley I’d install it in a heartbeat. But the fact that it’s Microsoft… I dunno. It just loses its appeal.

And that’s what I think Microsoft should do: found a little start-up company and start releasing stuff through them.

I guess what I’m saying is, I think Microsoft’s brand is standing in the way of Microsoft’s products. Assuming the products they release are good, which I’m doubtful.

See? There goes their brand getting in the way again.

Image courtesy of GonchoA.

Groupon rejects Google’s romantic advances [updated]

Google offered to buy Groupon (referral link) for a reported $6 billion.

That’s $6,000,000,000 for those of you who like to count zeroes.

That’s valuing Groupon growing at $4.1 million/day since they launched about four years ago.

That’s $6,000,000 for each employee if they divided it out equally.

That’s more than Google paid for YouTube (which is quite popular, by the way) by a magnitude of a gazillion.

SIX BILLION DOLLARS.

And they walked away.

Now, I get the “this is my baby and I want to see it through to the end” mentality. I often feel that attachment to my ideas and work. So I get it. I really do.

To a point.

Six billion dollars?

Take it. Take a year off. Then start on the next project that gets you excited.

Even if you want to go public and think you’ll end up with a higher dollar amount in the long run, it’s still a gamble. And what are you going to do with $8 billion that you can’t do with $6 billion?

The flawed comparison people make is to Mark Zuckerberg turning down a billion dollars for Facebook when he was 22 years old. There was precedence to this “odd behavior”: in high school Zuckerberg built MP3 software and, instead of selling it to Microsoft for a cool $1,000,000 he released it online for free. He genuinely seems to want to build something amazing as opposed to simply make money.

Plus, Groupon and Facebook are two completely different things. The stickiness of Facebook is incredible. People live their entire social lives on the site. Leaving for a competitor isn’t an option for most, even if the thought ever crossed their minds. Facebook is a medium that facilitates relationships with people you care about.

Groupon, on the other hand, facilitates getting cheap facials. Not to knock it, because they obviously have a very successful business. But while Facebook is making social connections through its network, Groupon is making one-time connections between people and a business. There’s no stickiness. People use them to save money. Period. Does it provide value? Yes. Loyalty? Not so much.

They should have sold.

Image courtesy of milky.way.

[UPDATED]

According to Business Insider, here’s why Groupon walked away (hint: the deal never would have gone through due to anti-trust regulation).