Category Archive: Tech

Here’s the plan

Going to rock the iPad 2 whenever it comes out (most speculation points to April). Saving my nickels and dimes.

Going to check out iPhone 5 this summer. I hear it’s going to be a pretty big redesign over the iPhone 4. Not sure how I feel about that since I think the iPhone 4 is stunningly beautiful.

“But it’s Apple!” you say. “You’ll love it no matter what.” Perhaps. But I didn’t like the look of the 3G when it came out (still prefer the look of the original) and I’m concerned I’ll run into the same scenario with the 5.

But if that’s the case I’ll probably be able to pick up an iPhone 4 for $99.

Anyway. That’s the plan. Tentatively. Just thought you should know. Carry oon.

Why didn’t Sony do it?

Wednesday I attended the Shift Summit at the Grand America Hotel here in Salt Lake. One of the speakers was Clark Gilbert, president and CEO of the Deseret News Publishing Company and Deseret Digital Media. His specialty is disruptive innovation which he has studied extensively at the Harvard Business School.

He talked about how titans of industry can be overturned, shrunk or entirely passed by because of disruptive innovation. The reason, he said, is because they’re at the top of their game and think of disruptive forces as “Not what we do.”

He asked what industries out there have been stopped dead in their tracks by disruptive influences. The first thing that came to my mind was music, so I offered it as an answer.

Clark then asked a series of questions:

Clark: “Who made the Walkman?”
Me: “Sony.”
Clark: “Who owns three music labels?”
Me: “Sony.”
Clark: “Who owns VH1?”
Me: “Sony.”
Clark: “Why didn’t they create the iPod?”

Bingo.

Goal number one is to identify disruption and get on that bandwagon before it destroys your industry/business/product. A loftier goal is to predict where disruption will happen and be the one to cause it.

The Million Dollar Question

Later someone else asked, “How can one tell if something is going to be disruptive?”

An excellent question.

Clark responded that it’s a lot easier to be a historian/academic than it is a CEO but offered this key insight in the form of a rhetorical question:

“Is it good for the consumer?”

Exactly.

Businesses get very involved in navel-gazing. They focus more on spreadsheets than they do trying to understand their customers. Two examples which are influenced by and the result of disruption: DVDs and DRM.

Digital Rights Management

Companies are so busy trying to protect their content (such as music and software) from piracy that they make it a royal pain in the butt for the people who paid to use it.

Case in point: registering software. You have to fork over your name, address, phone number and email address. Then you have to enter a difficult-to-type 32-character license key (which, if you ever lose, you’re out of luck should you want to reinstall the software) and then hope the verification process works. Adobe recently made their software check the license each time the software was opened, meaning you had to have an Internet connection to use Photoshop. Terrible.

Then you have to sign your life away and accept their “terms of service” which are long and written in legalese. My son probably belongs to Microsoft and I don’t even know it.

Meanwhile, the people who don’t pay for the content and steal it online don’t have to deal with the DRM which was meant to prevent them from getting it in the first place.

Who has the better experience?

DVDs

How about watching a movie at home? You can’t just put in the DVD and hit play. You have to sit through ten minutes of junk the studios want you to watch (multiple trailers, clip montages promoting the studio, seemingly endless “So-and So Studios” and “Produced by One Guy Productions” and “A Subsidiary of that Other Studio” and “A Fill-in-the-Blank Venture”) and, ironically, warnings about piracy, before you get to what you really want to watch: the movie.

Want to put the movie on your laptop to watch on a business trip? Nope. Kids scratch the disc? Out of luck.

Again, the person who downloads the movie off a torrent site for free doesn’t have to deal with any of the restrictions placed on paying customers.

Is there a solution?

I recently heard of an actor who pirates his own movies. Why would anyone do that?

He said he looked for the movie on iTunes, Amazon, Hulu and Netflix. He was willing to pay for it but couldn’t find it anywhere. His only option was to download an illegal copy. So he did.

Dear Studios, this is what is affectionately known as “cutting off your nose to spite your face.”

Here’s a crazy idea: make it easy for people to find your content and pay you for it. Finding anything you want to watch should be a no-brainer. The only trick should be to create a superb buying experience at a fair price.

Facebook is the Internet, right?

I know. Infographics are so 2010. But there are some interesting Facebook statistics over at Mashable. The one above caught my attention.

If I’m interpreting that correctly, the most popular things searched for in the United States in 2010 weren’t Obama, oil spill or Justin Bieber. They were “Facebook” and “Facebook login”.

This indicates some generalities about folks online:

  1. Even though people use Facebook all the time (+70% of US Internet users), many can’t remember “facebook.com” is where you login to Facebook.
  2. People don’t know how to use their browser to get to “facebook.com”.
  3. People don’t know how to bookmark pages in their browser.
  4. People don’t know how to use basic browser functionality.
  5. To many people, Facebook is the Internet.
  6. Google should be scared to death right now.

I realize I’m a nerd outlier when it comes to technology. But when the main reason people are going to google.com is to search for facebook.com it has me a little worried. Mainly because I think people are starting to think of Facebook as the Internet.

You know…like AOL was back in 1999.

A threat to the real Internet

If people don’t know how to use their browser to get to the site they spend hours on each day how could we expect them to navigate to other places on the web? If the walled garden of Facebook is truly being perceived as the Internet, it means innovation will be stifled and people will be essentially crippled as far as their understanding of what it is to be online. If these things aren’t understood, it’s also a huge threat to Net Neutrality.

That’s not a good thing. The web is wonderful and great and innovative and amazing because it’s open and fluid and information flows freely. In Facebook, information flows in but doesn’t flow out, ala roach motels. And it’s all controlled by a privately held company which isn’t accountable to anyone.

Google

And why should Google be wetting its proverbial pants? Because Google relies on people linking to things to generate its search results. When people link to things inside Facebook, Google can’t see (most of) those links. So the more people share links, pictures, comments and videos behind Facebook’s walled-off “Internet”, the less relevant Google becomes.

Google is already feeling the heat because they haven’t found a way to crack the social aspect of search: people are searching for things from their friends via Facebook instead of Google’s algorithms. A closed, proprietary and walled-off Internet is their worst nightmare and it’s becoming a reality.

Conclusion

What do you think? Am I getting all worked up over nothing? Or is this something to be worried about? Set me straight in the comments.

This post originally appeared on the ThomasArts blog.

Here’s what you need to know about the Verizon iPhone

As I’m sure you’ve heard by now, it’s officially official: Verizon is going to start carrying the iPhone 4 starting the February 10th (you folks who are already on Verizon and qualify for an upgrade can preorder on February 3rd).

Here’s what you need to know:

  • It’s not the iPhone 5. It’s the iPhone 4 with a different chip in it that makes it work on Verizon’s network.
  • The price of the phone is the same: $199 for 16 GB and $299 for 32 GB.
  • Verizon is mum on the details of their data plans. I’ve heard it’s going to be $30/mo (same as AT&T) for truly unlimited (not 5 GB “unlimited”) data. On the other hand, they aren’t saying. One speculation about why that is: the plans are going to be worse and they don’t want that to cloud the joyous news of them getting their shiny new handset. Time will tell.
  • Verizon’s theoretical 3G speeds are slower than AT&T’s. Take this with a grain of salt as it will all depend on the reception in your given area.
  • Can Verizon’s network handle the traffic? Will AT&T’s network become better if everyone floods to Verizon? Stay tuned.
  • If you’re streaming a YouTube video or downloading an email attachment and you decide to take or make a call, it will kill your download – you can’t do data and voice simultaneously on Verizon’s network. Sorry.

While I’m excited to be able to use the iPhone on a carrier other than AT&T (without unlocking it…I heart you T-Mobile), keep in mind that if you buy one, you’re buying tech that’s already six months old and half way through its lifecycle. And by that, I mean Apple has released a new iPhone each summer since the original came out. The iPhone 5 is most likely going to be released in June and will be available on Verizon. So if you get one now, it’s going to be outdated in six months and you’re going to be using it for two years.

Me? I’m holding off until iPhone 5. (And iPad 2, but that’s a different story.)

But if your phone is on its last legs and you’ve been waiting for this moment for four years, the iPhone 4 isn’t anything to turn your nose up at.

There you have it. Questions? Hit me up in the comments or visit our kindred spirits over at Engadget who have comprehensive iPhone coverage and involuntarily donated the above photo for my own sinister uses.

Image courtesy of Engadget.

The prodigal son returneth (kinda)

I’m back on my iPhone 3GS.

Kinda.

For a while.

The Droid 2 I got from work is…how shall I say it…unreliable. Over the last couple of weeks I’ve run into some recurring problems including, but not limited to:

  • The lock screen freezing requiring a restart (even after restarting)
  • Not being able to hear callers
  • Callers not being able to hear me
  • Unresponsive key on the physical keyboard

I can deal with the last one but the first three are kinda deal breakers. That, and I admit it, using the Droid 2 is starting to grate on my nerves a bit.

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking lately about experiences (as a general concept as well as how it applies to advertising) and I’ve decided my iPhone/Android battle comes down to this:

I can experience fewer things, better. Or I can experience more things in a worse way.

The iPhone has limited functionality and customization when compared to the Droid 2. But, as was recently said, using Android is like death by a thousand paper cuts – it can do a bunch of cool stuff but much of it is in a rather painful way.

The definition of “back”

Just one example: There’s a dedicated “back” button on all Android devices. Unfortunately, there’s no uniformity on what “back” means. Does it mean back to the previous screen? Yes. And sometimes that works. But does it go to the previous screen within the same app, or the previous screen even if it means switching to a different app? So is the back button the way you switch between apps? You can. Sometimes. (Although there’s separate app-switching functionality). Or, if you’re at the “beginning” does it back you out to the home screen? It varies wildly and is a terrible experience.

Reflecting on the last two months

As I said when I posted my thoughts on switching from iPhone to Android, from a user experience standpoint the current version of Android feels like what must have been an early beta of iOS: demonstrates basic functionality but in a rough-hewn way.

Here are a few additional thoughts in no particular order:

  • The camera/video camera on the Droid 2 sucks.
  • I’m already missing how easy it is to share information between apps: on the iPhone there’s no easy way to take something from Google Reader, for example, and push it to Read it Later or Delicious.
  • iPhone keyboard…my finger candy…daddy’s home now.
  • Can’t believe now sleek and solid the 3GS feels when compared to the Droid 2.
  • iPhone notifications…(grumble, grumble).
  • Tumblr is a much better app on iOS than Android.
  • With the Droid 2 there’s a 2-3 “lines of text lag” when scrolling. That is to say, if I’m reading something in the browser and slowly start scrolling my finger up, the screen doesn’t “catch” and start moving until I’ve moved over 2-3 lines of text. With the iPhone, it’s instantaneous.
  • I’ll miss the dedicated Google Reader app on Android.
  • I’ll really miss having 3G speeds. But that’s what I get for unlocking it and only paying $6/mo for data. ;)
  • Loving the iPhone + Apple TV integration. Although Android and my new Blu-Ray player both have DNLA so it could be sixes.
  • Hate having to turn on my laptop to sync everything to my iPhone.

In Limbo

So here’s the deal. On January 6th HTC is revealing the Thunderbolt (stupid name). It’s supposed to be the equivalent of HTC Desire HD for Verizon and have the HTC Sense I was so excited about. If anybody can polish the rough edges off Android, HTC can. So I’ll put an order in for that and use my iPhone until then. When the Thunderbolt (still a stupid name) arrives I’ll use it for the trial period and then make my final decision.

Besides, I have a hard time believing Apple won’t rectify some of my issues with iOS come February.

So much for me not being a phone slut.

Image courtesy of earcos.