<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I find your lack of aesthetics disturbing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theotherdrummer.com/2010/03/i-find-your-lack-of-aesthetics-disturbing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theotherdrummer.com/2010/03/i-find-your-lack-of-aesthetics-disturbing/</link>
	<description>Unclassifiable by definition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherdrummer.com/2010/03/i-find-your-lack-of-aesthetics-disturbing/comment-page-1/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theotherdrummer.com/?p=1428#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>While Microsoft has improved in the eye candy department, their UX (user experience) is still pretty nasty. The new Ribbon &quot;feature&quot; is a great example. It takes up about 20% of the screen real estate with an ever-changing range of options most people don&#039;t need and never use.

Yes, Google&#039;s stuff is ugly. 

Both appear to be designed by engineers.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Microsoft has improved in the eye candy department, their UX (user experience) is still pretty nasty. The new Ribbon &#8220;feature&#8221; is a great example. It takes up about 20% of the screen real estate with an ever-changing range of options most people don&#8217;t need and never use.</p>
<p>Yes, Google&#8217;s stuff is ugly. </p>
<p>Both appear to be designed by engineers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherdrummer.com/2010/03/i-find-your-lack-of-aesthetics-disturbing/comment-page-1/#comment-3044</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theotherdrummer.com/?p=1428#comment-3044</guid>
		<description>While Microsoft has improved in the eye candy department, their UX (user experience) is still pretty nasty. The new Ribbon &quot;feature&quot; is a great example. It takes up about 20% of the screen real estate with an ever-changing range of options most people don&#039;t need and never use.

Yes, Google&#039;s stuff is ugly. 

Both appear to be designed by engineers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Microsoft has improved in the eye candy department, their UX (user experience) is still pretty nasty. The new Ribbon &#8220;feature&#8221; is a great example. It takes up about 20% of the screen real estate with an ever-changing range of options most people don&#8217;t need and never use.</p>
<p>Yes, Google&#8217;s stuff is ugly. </p>
<p>Both appear to be designed by engineers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherdrummer.com/2010/03/i-find-your-lack-of-aesthetics-disturbing/comment-page-1/#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theotherdrummer.com/?p=1428#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that I follow exactly.  I think that alot of the Microsoft products have become much more friendly to the eye.  Ex: Bing, new Zune OS, Windows Phone OS, Windows 7.  They all seem to have a revamp toward eye candy.  Google, I will admit, continues to be ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that I follow exactly.  I think that alot of the Microsoft products have become much more friendly to the eye.  Ex: Bing, new Zune OS, Windows Phone OS, Windows 7.  They all seem to have a revamp toward eye candy.  Google, I will admit, continues to be ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherdrummer.com/2010/03/i-find-your-lack-of-aesthetics-disturbing/comment-page-1/#comment-3043</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theotherdrummer.com/?p=1428#comment-3043</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that I follow exactly.  I think that alot of the Microsoft products have become much more friendly to the eye.  Ex: Bing, new Zune OS, Windows Phone OS, Windows 7.  They all seem to have a revamp toward eye candy.  Google, I will admit, continues to be ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that I follow exactly.  I think that alot of the Microsoft products have become much more friendly to the eye.  Ex: Bing, new Zune OS, Windows Phone OS, Windows 7.  They all seem to have a revamp toward eye candy.  Google, I will admit, continues to be ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.theotherdrummer.com/2010/03/i-find-your-lack-of-aesthetics-disturbing/comment-page-1/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theotherdrummer.com/?p=1428#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>Can I get a hallaleujah?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I get a hallaleujah?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

